Print at Dec 21, 2025, 5:47:00 AM

Posted by natsumerio at Jan 19, 2013, 9:04:28 AM
Re: Questions about the jar executable version.
You said that in the portable version that you can install plugins manually by copying SH3P files at the right place. Where is the right place that you say to manually copy them to?

any 64-bit version does not have to be a portable version of the program
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. Do you mean that I was wrong to propose both 32 bit and 64 bit executables in the portable version?

When I said that any 64-bit version of SH3D does not have to also be a portable program, I meant only any 64-bit version of SH3D that existed, if any 64-bit versions of it do exist besides the portable version, but not counting the portable version because of it being harder to use plugins with it.

As for you including both 32-bit & 64-bit executables in the portable version, maybe it would help to make 2 portable versions: one that is multi-platform but only 32-bit, & one that is multi-platform but only 64-bit. If you do it that way, then maybe you could program the portable 64-bit version to try to automatically detect if you have a 64-bit version of java (& tell you to install it if you don't, & let you set the path to where it is if you do have it but it's not installed in the default directory), & to try to automatically detect how much RAM your PC has.

OFF TOP.
For those of us who only have 64-bit java on our PC's, I hope that everybody knows that java recently found out that version 7.10 is vulnerable, & to uninstall it & install version 7-11 instead. I think that 32-bit java automatically gets notified of things like that, bit 64-bit java can't get updates, so people with only 64-bit java might not know about this security threat.