So an excellent alternative and sometimes the only one available but if there's a model available or I can create it than that would remain my preferred way. I think that goes for most users who do not mainly focus on photo rendering.
Yes, of course, it's all about the need to do the exact rendering. Not everyone needs it as the main result of their work. I use the SH3D program for exactly this purpose, just for visualization, so I'm exploring these possibilities. They are important to me, of course. I want to say once again that SH3D has a volume limit that is very difficult to go beyond in the render. And such photos as a replacement for models help to fill the interior with objects and continue to use this wonderful program. Yes, there are other excellent visualization programs that are certainly better and more productive than SH, but I'm trying to be faithful))) his first love. The 3D model in SH3D does not allow showing many types of materials - unpolished metal, for example, with its complex reflexes and reflections. Unfortunately, my experiments with complex rendering settings have no real benefit (although some hidden features can be used locally). Photos of some parts can help replace this flaw without compromising the standard rendering. For me, this is a very good way to work at the right level of visualization. And do not use other special programs. This is a top-level sport for me))).
