not compatible application version

This topic has been viewed 5559 times and has 8 replies
Thread status: Active
Questions about extending features and developing plug-ins [img]http://www.sweethome3d.com/images/flags/en_small.gif[/img]
Post Reply New Topic
adampease
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:39 pm

not compatible application version

Post by adampease »

When starting up sweethome3d on Ubuntu Linux, with several of the plugins, I'm getting the message

Invalid plug-in jar:file:/home/apease/.eteks/sweethome3d/plugins/CopyAsNewFurniture.sh3p!/com%2Feteks%2Fsweethome3d%2Fplugin%2Fcopyasnewfurniture%2FApplicationPlugin.properties:
Not compatible application version

Could someone advise?
User avatar
Puybaret
Posts: 9440
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 12:00 pm
Country: Paris, France
Contact:

Re: not compatible application version

Post by Puybaret »

What version of Sweet Home 3D do you use?
Emmanuel Puybaret, Sweet Home 3D creator
adampease
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:39 pm

Re: not compatible application version

Post by adampease »

It's version 2.6, which is the version that installs from the Ubuntu Software Center
User avatar
Puybaret
Posts: 9440
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 12:00 pm
Country: Paris, France
Contact:

Re: not compatible application version

Post by Puybaret »

Emmanuel Puybaret, Sweet Home 3D creator
adampease
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:39 pm

Re: not compatible application version

Post by adampease »

Thanks Emmanuel, using the latest version solves the problem. Maybe someone could update the version in the Ubuntu repository. That will help other newcomers. Many thanks for the excellent software!
adampease
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:39 pm

Re: not compatible application version

Post by adampease »

Well, I may have spoken too soon. I now get a JRE crash, as well as some messages about other plugins being invalid. This is all while trying to follow the "sloping ceiling" tutorial. The crash happens while attempting step 8 on page 8 of the tutorial Furniture->import furniture . I can replicate the crash.

apease@apease-HPdm:~/Programs/SweetHome3D-3.5$ ./SweetHome3D
Invalid plug-in jar:file:/home/apease/.eteks/sweethome3d/plugins/RotateHomePlugin.zip!/RotateHomePlugin%2Fsrc%2Forg%2Faddy%2Fsh3d%2Fplugin%2FApplicationPlugin.properties:
org.addy.sh3d.plugin.RotateHomePlugin
Invalid plug-in jar:file:/home/apease/.eteks/sweethome3d/plugins/DuplicateStylePlugin_version4.zip!/DuplicateStylePlugin_version4%2Fsrc%2FnewPlugin%2FApplicationPlugin.properties:
newPlugin.CopyStylePlugin
#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
# SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00007fcd8ea86b24, pid=9121, tid=140520710752000
#
# JRE version: 6.0_32-b05
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (20.7-b02 mixed mode linux-amd64 compressed oops)
# Problematic frame:
# C [libGL.so.1+0x25b24] __float128+0x64
#
# An error report file with more information is saved as:
# /home/apease/Programs/SweetHome3D-3.5/hs_err_pid9121.log
#
# If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
# http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp
# The crash happened outside the Java Virtual Machine in native code.
# See problematic frame for where to report the bug.
#
Aborted
User avatar
Puybaret
Posts: 9440
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 12:00 pm
Country: Paris, France
Contact:

Re: not compatible application version

Post by Puybaret »

Maybe someone could update the version in the Ubuntu repository.
Sorry I take care only of versions delivered on SourceForge.net. Please contact Ubuntu team directly.

Sorry for the crash, it generally means an issue with the video driver. Hope you can fix it.
Emmanuel Puybaret, Sweet Home 3D creator
adampease
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:39 pm

Re: not compatible application version

Post by adampease »

Hi Emmanuel - Just to be clear, the current issue with the crash is with the version from SourceForge.net - version 3.5.
adampease
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:39 pm

Re: not compatible application version

Post by adampease »

I've replicated the problem also now with both JRE 6 and JRE 7. I've reported the bug to Oracle and will let you know if their feedback indicates that any change in use of Java is needed.
Post Reply New Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests