|
Sweet Home 3D Forum » List all forums » » Forum: Gallery » » » Thread: Some examples using the indirect light |
||
| Print at Dec 18, 2025, 12:29:44 PM |
|
|
| Posted by enkonyito at Apr 23, 2016, 10:39:15 PM |
|
Some examples using the indirect light My settings: antiAliasing.min=0, antiAliasing.max=0, globalIllumination=path, diffusedBounces=2 causticsPhotons=0, shininessShader=glossy, normalLens.focusDistance=250, normalLens.radius=1 filter=mitchell, samplerAlgorithm=bucket Photo made in 1536x864 pixels then resized in 512x288. SweetHome3DExample4 ![]() rendering time : 1h 43min 50.4s SweetHome3DExample4 ![]() rendering time : 1h 35min 19.73s SweetHome3DExample5 ![]() rendering time : 1h 32min 26.94s SweetHome3DExample5 ![]() rendering time : 2h 17min 59.12s SweetHome3DExample5 ![]() rendering time : 45min 56.11s SweetHome3DExample5 ![]() rendering time : 37min 48.53s ---------------------------------------- EnkoNyito |
| Posted by Puybaret at Apr 24, 2016, 9:25:50 AM |
|
Re: Some examples using the indirect light Thanks for posting these images ![]() It would be very nice if you indicate how much time it took to render these images with your settings, and even better, with default Sweet Home 3D settings. It could help to evaluate if it might worth it to make some improvements in Sweet Home 3D. ---------------------------------------- Emmanuel Puybaret, Sweet Home 3D creator |
| Posted by hansmex at Apr 24, 2016, 10:23:47 AM |
|
Re: Some examples using the indirect light Ideally we would need: A plug-in that: a - allows to play with the render settings AND b - renders a file and reports the duration of the render Both features are available now, but in separate plug-ins. Standard files that could be used for these experiments. These files should be designed to include "problem areas" such as white specks, transparency, shininess, etc. I would be happy to run a large number of tests. Hans ---------------------------------------- Hans new website - under constuction hansdirkse.info |
| Posted by enkonyito at Apr 25, 2016, 10:02:04 PM |
|
Re: Some examples using the indirect light It would be very nice if you indicate how much time it took to render these images with your settings, and even better, with default Sweet Home 3D settings. In the previous post, I added in blue my settings and the rendering times. I use a computer with only 2 cores.Common default settings for quality 4 : causticsPhotons=0, shininessShader=default, normalLens.focusDistance=250, normalLens.radius=1 filter=blackman-harris, samplerAlgorithm=bucket Photo made in 512x288 pixels. SweetHome3DExample4 ![]() rendering time : 6min 59.77s (aAmin 1, aAmax 2, gI default, dB 1) SweetHome3DExample4 ![]() rendering time : 2h 53min 44.64s (aAmin 1, aAmax 2, gI path, dB 2) By reducing antialiasing values, rendering time is shorter. SweetHome3DExample5 ![]() rendering time : 8min 8.78s (aAmin 1, aAmax 2, gI default, dB 1) SweetHome3DExample5 ![]() rendering time : 43min 14.76s (aAmin 0, aAmax 1, gI path, dB 2) SweetHome3DExample5 ![]() rendering time : 7min 14.52s (aAmin 1, aAmax 2, gI default, dB 1) SweetHome3DExample5 ![]() rendering time : 15min 34.32s (aAmin 0, aAmax 1, gI path, dB 2) ---------------------------------------- EnkoNyito |
| Posted by enkonyito at Apr 25, 2016, 10:42:52 PM |
|
Re: Some examples using the indirect light Ideally we would need: I had thought to integrate advanced settings in the default photo panel but it was not possible at the time.A plug-in that: a - allows to play with the render settings AND b - renders a file and reports the duration of the render Both features are available now, but in separate plug-ins. Now there is a new photo plug-in, it might be feasible for a future release. We could add a button to open a dialog box displaying the photo renderer properties related to the quality indicated by the slider. ---------------------------------------- EnkoNyito |
| Posted by enkonyito at Apr 27, 2016, 3:10:15 AM |
|
Re: Some examples using the indirect light Another example: SweetHome3DExample10-FlatWithMezzanine. Photo made in 1200x900 pixels then resized to 600x450. ![]() rendering time: 8min 5.35s (aAmin 0, aAmax 0, gI default, dB 1) ![]() rendering time: 51min 36.41s (aAmin 0, aAmax 0, gI path, dB 1) ---------------------------------------- EnkoNyito |
| Posted by enkonyito at Sep 17, 2016, 6:22:21 PM |
|
Re: Some examples using the indirect light SweetHome3DExample8 Photo renderer properties: antiAliasing.min=0, antiAliasing.max=0, globalIllumination=path, diffusedBounces=2 causticsPhotons=0, shininessShader=glossy, normalLens.focusDistance=250, normalLens.radius=1 filter=mitchell, samplerAlgorithm=bucket Photo made in 1200x900 pixels then resized to 600x450. Kitchen perspective rendering time: 1h 26min 28.6s Bathroom rendering time: 29min 26.2s Bedroom #1 rendering time: 41min 21.4s Bedroom #2 rendering time: 41min 10.2s Bedroom #3 rendering time: 44min 22.0s Bedroom #4 rendering time: 43min 57.3s ---------------------------------------- EnkoNyito |
| Posted by bdfd at Sep 17, 2016, 6:40:12 PM |
|
Re: Some examples using the indirect light And ![]() ---------------------------------------- Evil progresses when good people do nothing! --- SH3D 7.1 and nothing else - W11 64b in 4K |
| Posted by MartinSK at Sep 18, 2016, 9:17:33 AM |
|
Re: Some examples using the indirect light Hi enkonyito thanks for this forum here I made my experiment here /maybe good for some users/... /photo of cousin's house/ I try to compare IPR algorythm to BUCKET algorythm /INTEL CORE i3-5010 combinet with NVIDIA GEFORCE 930M graphic cards/ settings IPR image AA min2 AA max4 GI default sS silk algorithm IPR filter blackman harris pic size 3500x2333px....then resized to 1500x1000px time rendering..2hours 5minutes ![]() benefits: short rendering time,simple algorithm able to rendered complicated scenes /for me very good for exterior scenes with GI path settings/ disadvantages:"plain final projection",significant shines reduction,very big size of final picture which need to be reduced settings BUCKET image AA min2 AA max4 GI default sS silk algorithm BUCKET filter blackman harris pic size 1100x733px then changed to 1500x1000px /the same settings as previous. I changed algorithm and pic size only/ time rendering 7hours 50minutes ![]() benefits:plastic and realistic final view /the difference is significant on big screen/,small final picture size, /for me good for interior images/ disadvantages:very long rendering time,sometimes troubles with more complicated scenes love these experiments ![]() |
| Posted by MartinSK at Sep 18, 2016, 10:18:05 AM |
|
Re: Some examples using the indirect light Excuse me.. I know that my experiment is not about indirect light but I don't want to made new discusssion because of 2 pictures. For me was better to post it here. |
|
|
|
Current timezone is GMT Dec 18, 2025, 12:29:44 PM |