How to represent sculptures that you don't have a 3-D model for?
This topic has been viewed 16501 times and has 10 replies
How to represent sculptures that you don't have a 3-D model for?
All,
I am building a virtual art gallery of my wife's work using SweetHome3D.
However, we don't have 3D models of her sculptures, and given how detailed they are, making them would be prohibitively time-consuming. I am struggling with how to render these in SweetHome3D.
I have used boxes, and attached 2-D bitmaps to each of the sides, in essence, creating a box with images. That works, but isn't great.
What would be really cool (but don't think is possible) would be to have an object with a bitmap image, but that somehow that image "always faced" the camera in 3-D view or when taking a movie. It would always be in the same location, but would rotate so the 2-D image directly faced the camera. This way, whatever angle you look at the object, you get the same bitmap image.
Is it possible to create an object that breaks the laws of physics like that?
I am building a virtual art gallery of my wife's work using SweetHome3D.
However, we don't have 3D models of her sculptures, and given how detailed they are, making them would be prohibitively time-consuming. I am struggling with how to render these in SweetHome3D.
I have used boxes, and attached 2-D bitmaps to each of the sides, in essence, creating a box with images. That works, but isn't great.
What would be really cool (but don't think is possible) would be to have an object with a bitmap image, but that somehow that image "always faced" the camera in 3-D view or when taking a movie. It would always be in the same location, but would rotate so the 2-D image directly faced the camera. This way, whatever angle you look at the object, you get the same bitmap image.
Is it possible to create an object that breaks the laws of physics like that?
Re: How to represent sculptures that you don't have a 3-D model for?
Other thoughts are that if I can't do this, is there a better way? Perhaps wrap the image twice around a cylinder or octagon pillar instead of a box? I am open to any suggestions.
Re: How to represent sculptures that you don't have a 3-D model for?
In lieu of making a rough 3D model, I would probably use a very flat box (or better, just a two-faced vertical rectangle).
Then I would use images of the sculpture (front and back) and remove the background (i.e. make transparent, some image editing necessary, but it is not that hard).
Apply the two images as textures, one on each side. You would miss a full 3d effect, but you would get a pretty good visualisation from most viewpoints.
ok
PS (you don't list e-mail, but if you send me one I can send you an example)
Then I would use images of the sculpture (front and back) and remove the background (i.e. make transparent, some image editing necessary, but it is not that hard).
Apply the two images as textures, one on each side. You would miss a full 3d effect, but you would get a pretty good visualisation from most viewpoints.
ok
PS (you don't list e-mail, but if you send me one I can send you an example)
Re: How to represent sculptures that you don't have a 3-D model for?
Good idea! I like it!
As long as I don't shoot the video too close to the side, it should look OK.
-->Adam
As long as I don't shoot the video too close to the side, it should look OK.
-->Adam
Re: How to represent sculptures that you don't have a 3-D model for?
Did a quick test, and it looked ok. Let me know if you need a copy of my test file. ok
Re: How to represent sculptures that you don't have a 3-D model for?
Many thanks, and it worked. Just for comparison:Did a quick test, and it looked ok. Let me know if you need a copy of my test file. ok
My way (bitmap boxes): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWVXMxhASkk
Your way (transparent flat boxes): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MyGGdWQdTE
The transparent boxes are much better. I also went with a circular room to avoid shooting sculptures from the wrong direction.
Re: How to represent sculptures that you don't have a 3-D model for?
Thanks for sharing the result. Splendid job you did. And useful to know the approach could be good for tricky objects. Good luck with your wife's exhibition! ok
-
MariusTitulescu
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 7:09 am
- Country: Romania
Re: How to represent sculptures that you don't have a 3-D model for?
Wow! I can't believe it turned out so good. Do you have other recent stuff made in the same way?
____________
Marius Artys
____________
Marius Artys
Re: How to represent sculptures that you don't have a 3-D model for?
Although he seems to be a fellow countryman of mine, he is attempting to advertise.
I consider this to be SPAM.
I consider this to be SPAM.
A computer program does what you tell it to do, not what you want it to do. Murphy's Law
When all else fails, read the instructions. Murphy's Law
If you don't like "AS IS", DIY. Dorin's law
When all else fails, read the instructions. Murphy's Law
If you don't like "AS IS", DIY. Dorin's law
Re: How to represent sculptures that you don't have a 3-D model for?
It is spam. I reported it using the abuse button (bottom right of the post: [X-(] between [Link] and the up arrow.)
That doesn't show in the thread though.
That doesn't show in the thread though.
Dodecagon.nl
1300+ 3D models, manuals, and projects
1300+ 3D models, manuals, and projects
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest